Pro‑Pyongyang Newspaper Flags North Korea Omission in U.S. December 2025 National Security Strategy
Updated (2 articles)
Omission of North Korea Dominates NSS Critique The National Security Strategy released in early December 2025 contains no reference to North Korea or its nuclear program. Both Yonhap reports note the omission as the document’s most striking feature. Analysts in Seoul view the silence as a possible shift in U.S. policy focus. The lack of mention has sparked immediate commentary from pro‑Pyongyang media [1][2].
Choson Sinbo Frames Omission as Policy Signal The Japan‑based newspaper Choson Sinbo, run by a Korean organization sympathetic to Pyongyang, labeled the omission “the most notable aspect” of the NSS. Its editorial suggests the Trump administration may be deprioritizing the Korean Peninsula issue. The paper argues that acknowledging North Korea would admit a failure of previous denuclearization efforts. This perspective reflects the regime’s stance on U.S. strategic priorities [1][2].
Editorial Attacks NSS for U.S.-First Narrative Choson Sinbo criticizes the strategy for offering “little international security analysis” and for promoting a U.S.-first agenda. It describes the document as self‑contradictory and factually distorting. The newspaper also accuses the NSS of portraying President Trump as an exaggerated peacemaker. These critiques underscore the paper’s broader distrust of U.S. security rhetoric [1][2].
North Korean State Media Remains Silent Despite the editorial outcry, North Korea’s official state media has not issued a response to the NSS. Yonhap highlights this silence as part of the reporting context. The absence of a rebuttal leaves the regime’s official position on the omission unclear. Observers note that the silence may be strategic or simply a delay in state‑run messaging [1][2].
Seoul Interprets Omission as Possible Isolationist Turn South Korean officials have raised concerns that the NSS’s lack of reference to North Korea could signal an isolationist shift, echoing the paper’s claim of a “Fortress America” posture. The omission fuels debate over whether the U.S. will continue active engagement on the peninsula. Analysts warn that sidelining the issue may affect regional stability. The discussion continues as both governments assess the strategy’s implications [1][2].
Sources
-
1.
Yonhap: Pro-Pyongyang paper flags omission of North Korea in US security strategy: Summarizes Choson Sinbo’s editorial calling the lack of North Korea mention the most notable part of the December NSS and critiques its U.S.-first tone.
-
2.
Yonhap: Pro-Pyongyang paper notes North Korea omission from US security strategy: Highlights the same omission, notes it as first reaction, points out no response from North Korean state media, and emphasizes concerns about policy deprioritization under Trump.
Timeline
Early Dec 2025 – The United States releases its National Security Strategy (NSS) without any reference to North Korea or its nuclear program, a departure from prior strategies that routinely highlighted the regime as a core security concern. [1][2]
Dec 17, 2025 – Pro‑Pyongyang newspaper Choson Sinbo publishes an editorial declaring the omission of North Korea the “most notable” aspect of the NSS and questioning whether the Trump administration will deprioritize the peninsula’s denuclearisation. [2]
Dec 17, 2025 – Choson Sinbo argues the omission exists because mentioning North Korea would force the United States to admit a “complete failure” in its policy to denuclearise the Korean Peninsula. [1]
Dec 17, 2025 – The newspaper criticises the NSS as offering little international‑security analysis, describing it as a self‑contradictory, fact‑distorting document that pushes a “U.S.–first” agenda and exaggerates President Trump’s role as a peacemaker. [1][2]
Dec 17, 2025 – Choson Sinbo asserts the NSS portrays the United States as abandoning its “world‑police” role for a “Fortress America” isolationist stance. [1]
Dec 17, 2025 – North Korea’s state media has not issued any response to the NSS omission, a silence the editorial highlights as noteworthy. [2]
Dec 17, 2025 – The outlet notes it is run by a Japan‑based Korean organization sympathetic to North Korea and is widely seen as reflecting the regime’s stance; the piece marks its first (according to one report, second) reaction to the new NSS. [1][2]