Rubio to Meet Danish Leaders as Trump Revives Push for Greenland Purchase
Updated (2 articles)
Rubio Schedules Diplomatic Talks After Danish Request U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced he will meet Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenland’s foreign minister Vivian Motzfeldt next week, fulfilling a formal request that follows earlier unsuccessful attempts [1][2]. The meeting aims to address heightened U.S. interest in Greenland, a self‑governing Danish territory, and to calm tensions stirred by recent American statements. Both outlets note that the talks occur amid broader strategic discussions about Arctic security.
Trump Administration Reasserts Arctic Strategic Priority President Donald Trump revived his claim that the United States must secure Greenland to counter expanding Chinese and Russian influence after the capture of Nicolás Maduro [1][2]. The administration frames the island’s location and natural resources as vital to U.S. defense in the Arctic and North Atlantic. This rhetoric has placed Greenland back on the diplomatic agenda and drawn close scrutiny from NATO allies.
Purchase Preferred, Military Option Still Mentioned Rubio told lawmakers that the administration’s official goal is to purchase Greenland rather than seize it by force, a position first reported by the Wall Street Journal [1][2]. The White House, however, reiterated that a military option “remains on the table,” while emphasizing diplomacy as President Trump’s first choice. This dual posture has prompted concern that coercive language could strain alliance cohesion.
European Allies Warn NATO Fallout Over Any Takeover Leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom joined Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen in stating that Greenland “belongs to its people” and that a U.S. takeover would jeopardize NATO ties [1][2]. Denmark recently approved expanded U.S. access to its air bases, but officials warned that such permissions could be revoked if annexation attempts proceed. Analysts note the U.S. already operates the Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, reducing any security gain from outright acquisition.
Sources (2 articles)
-
[1]
Newsweek: Marco Rubio will meet Danish officials after Trump administration again eyes control of Greenland – details Rubio’s upcoming meeting, Trump’s renewed strategic argument, the White House’s mixed diplomatic‑military stance, and broad European condemnation
-
[2]
AP: Rubio to meet Danish officials after Trump revives bid to acquire Greenland – emphasizes the formal Danish request, the purchase‑over‑seizure narrative, and NATO allies’ warning of alliance breach
Timeline
2025 (date not specified) – President Donald Trump revives his argument that the United States must secure Greenland after the capture of former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, framing the island as essential to counter China and Russia in the Arctic and to protect U.S. interests in the region [1][2].
June (year not specified) – Denmark’s parliament passes a bill expanding U.S. access to Danish air bases; the United States already operates the Pituffik Space Base in north‑western Greenland, giving it a substantial security presence without sovereignty [1][2].
Jan 7, 2026 – White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt tells reporters that “using the military to acquire Greenland is always an option,” while stressing that President Trump’s first choice remains diplomacy [1][2].
Jan 7, 2026 – U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announces he will meet Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenland’s foreign minister Vivian Motzfeldt next week, and he declines to discuss military options in detail ahead of the talks [2].
Jan 7, 2026 – Rubio informs a group of lawmakers that the administration’s stated intent is to purchase Greenland rather than seize it, saying, “Our goal is a purchase, not a seizure,” a remark first reported by The Wall Street Journal after a classified briefing [1][2].
Jan 7, 2026 – European leaders and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen issue a joint statement that “Greenland belongs to its people,” warning that a U.S. takeover would “mean the end of NATO,” underscoring allied fears that coercive action would damage alliance cohesion [1][2].