Democratic Party Halts Merger Talks, Vows to Advance Lee Hae‑chan’s Peace Agenda
Updated (2 articles)
Lee Hae‑chan’s Death in Vietnam Triggers National Mourning Former prime minister Lee Hae‑chan collapsed in Ho Chi Minh City on Friday, was hospitalized for a stent insertion, and suffered cardiac arrest that caused his death on Sunday [1][2]. He had arrived in Vietnam on Thursday after flu‑like symptoms worsened [1][2]. His passing prompted the Democratic Party to convene a Supreme Council meeting in Seoul and declare a five‑day mourning period from Jan 27‑31 [1][2].
Democratic Party Suspends Merger Debate to Honor Lee At the Jan 26 Supreme Council session, party leaders set aside the planned merger with the minor Rebuilding Korea Party [1]. The meeting, originally scheduled for Jeju, was moved to the National Assembly out of respect for Lee [1]. Both supporters and dissenting lawmakers, including Rep. Lee Un‑ju, joined the condolence ceremony and avoided the merger topic [1].
Jung Chung‑rae Pledges Continuation of Lee’s Democratization and Peace Agenda Party leader Jung Chung‑rae called Lee a “symbol of South Korea’s democratization” and vowed to keep his human‑rights and inter‑Korean peace initiatives alive [2]. He framed Lee’s legacy as a compass for future reforms and described peace on the peninsula as an unfinished task [2]. Jung’s remarks emphasized the DP’s reliance on veteran figures to guide policy under the Lee Jae Myung administration [2].
Official Funeral Schedule and Council Vacancy Highlight Political Transition Lee’s funeral rites are slated for five consecutive days, Jan 27‑31, with ceremonies held in Seoul [1][2]. His death leaves a vacancy in the Peaceful Unification Advisory Council, where he served as senior vice chairperson since October [1][2]. The council’s leadership gap underscores ongoing political transitions affecting inter‑Korean relations [1][2].
Sources (2 articles)
-
[1]
Yonhap: Democratic Party Pauses Merger Talks to Mourn Former Prime Minister Lee Hae‑chan: reports DP’s Supreme Council meeting, postponement of merger with Rebuilding Korea Party, Lee’s death details, funeral schedule, and remarks from party leaders .
-
[2]
Yonhap: DP Leader Commits to Continue Lee Hae‑chan’s Democratization and Peace Agenda: focuses on Jung Chung‑rae’s pledge to uphold Lee’s democratic and peace legacy, outlines Lee’s senior advisory role, and situates his death within broader political transitions .
Timeline
Oct 2025 – Lee Hae‑chan receives a senior vice‑chair appointment on the Peaceful Unification Advisory Council, positioning him as a key architect of North‑Korea policy under President Yoon’s administration and signaling his continued influence on inter‑Korean diplomacy[1][2].
Jan 23, 2026 – While in Ho Chi Minh City, Lee collapses from flu‑like symptoms, is rushed to a hospital, and undergoes a coronary stent procedure; the incident underscores the sudden health crisis that will soon remove a veteran statesman from South Korean politics[1][2].
Jan 25, 2026 – Lee suffers cardiac arrest and dies in Vietnam, ending a career that spanned decades of democratic activism and peace‑building, and creating a leadership vacuum in the Peaceful Unification Advisory Council[1][2].
Jan 26, 2026 – The Democratic Party’s Supreme Council convenes at the National Assembly, pauses its planned merger with the Rebuilding Korea Party, and dedicates the session to mourning Lee; leader Jung Chung‑rae calls Lee “a symbol of South Korea’s democratization” and a “spiritual pillar” of the pro‑democracy movement, pledging to “open the path toward peace” and to carry forward Lee’s reforms[1][2][2].
Jan 26, 2026 – Floor leader Han Byung‑do and dissenting lawmaker Lee Un‑ju publicly honor Lee’s legacy, highlighting his role in broadening public support for the Democratic Party and demonstrating party unity despite prior merger opposition[1].
Jan 27 – 31, 2026 – The Democratic Party declares an official five‑day mourning period and schedules funeral rites, signaling respect for Lee’s contributions and temporarily suspending internal strategic debates, which may affect the party’s near‑term political calculus[1].