Europe Hardens Stance, Mulls €93 Billion Retaliatory Tariffs Over Trump’s Greenland Threat
Updated (6 articles)
Trump’s 10 % Tariff Threat Targets Eight Allies President Trump announced a 10 % import levy on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland, to begin 1 February, with a possible increase to 25 % on 1 June if negotiations on Greenland fail [6][5][2]. He framed the tariffs as leverage to force talks on U.S. control of the Danish territory, describing Greenland as a “security asset” [1][6]. The announcement was made via his Truth Social platform while he was at his West Palm Beach golf club [6].
European Governments Issue Unified Rebuttal The eight nations released a joint statement condemning the tariffs as coercive and a threat to transatlantic relations [3][4][2]. Leaders emphasized that the small NATO‑led troop deployments to Greenland are “non‑threatening” and called for dialogue rather than economic pressure [3][4][5]. Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer, France’s Emmanuel Macron and Italy’s Giorgia Meloni all labeled the move a mistake or unacceptable intimidation [5][4][3].
EU Mobilizes Economic Countermeasures EU diplomats warned they could impose up to €93 billion in retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods or restrict American banks and high‑tech firms from the single market [1]. An emergency meeting of all 27 EU ambassadors was convened in Brussels, and EU Council President Antonio Costa announced a summit later in the week to coordinate a response [5][3][2]. Germany’s finance minister rejected any “blackmail” and pledged to defend the bloc against coercion [1][2].
Arctic Security Deployments Remain Symbolic Denmark‑led “Arctic Endurance” exercises have sent small reconnaissance contingents from France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom to Greenland [5][4][3]. Officials stress the forces are limited in size, intended solely for regional security, and pose no threat to any nation [3][4]. The deployments have become a focal point linking security policy to the tariff dispute.
Protests Amplify Greenland Self‑Determination Concerns Thousands marched in Nuuk and Copenhagen, demanding respect for Greenlandic self‑governance and rejecting any U.S. takeover [5][6]. Demonstrators displayed Greenlandic and Danish flags and called the tariff threat an infringement on the island’s autonomy [6][5]. The public outcry adds domestic pressure on both Danish and European leaders as they negotiate with Washington.
Sources (6 articles)
-
[1]
BBC: Europe hardens stance as Trump Greenland drive sparks tariff showdown: Details Trump’s security‑focused framing of Greenland, Germany’s refusal to be “blackmailed,” and the EU’s €93 bn tariff warning, highlighting a shift from diplomacy to assertive trade tactics .
-
[2]
AP: Trump tariff threat tests European alliances over Greenland dispute: Reports the 10 % tariff threat, the joint European rebuke, EU summit plans, and legal uncertainties surrounding the tariffs .
-
[3]
King5: Europe warns of dangerous downward spiral after Trump threatens tariffs over Greenland: Emphasizes the joint statement, EU summit, expert doubts on tariff legality, and Italy’s criticism of the move .
-
[4]
AP: European leaders condemn Trump's 10% Greenland tariff: Focuses on the unclear EU‑wide impact, the link between tariffs and troop deployments, and the call for dialogue .
-
[5]
BBC: Trump tariff threat over Greenland draws European condemnation: Highlights the 10 % levy effective Feb 1, emergency EU meeting, protests in Nuuk and Copenhagen, and NATO‑linked reconnaissance troops .
-
[6]
AP: Trump proposes 10% tariffs on eight European nations over Greenland dispute: Provides the tariff timeline, lever‑as‑renegotiation framing, EU leadership’s warning of a “downward spiral,” and protest activity .
Timeline
Jan 17, 2026 – President Trump announces a 10 % import tariff on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland, warning it will rise to 25 % on June 1 if no deal on Greenland is reached. He frames the measure as “leverage to renegotiate Greenland,” calling the Arctic territory “vital to U.S. security.” Protests erupt in Nuuk and Copenhagen, with hundreds in Greenland and thousands in Denmark marching against any U.S. takeover. European officials warn the move could “undermine transatlantic relations” and raise legal questions about the use of emergency powers [5].
Jan 18, 2026 – Trump formally imposes the 10 % tariff, stating it will take effect on Feb 1 and is tied to “the Safety, Security, and Survival of our Planet.” He reiterates past rhetoric that Washington could take Greenland by force [2].
Jan 18, 2026 – UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemns the tariffs, saying “applying tariffs on allies for pursuing NATO security is completely wrong.” French President Emmanuel Macron calls the action “unacceptable” and vows Europe will not be swayed by intimidation [2].
Jan 18, 2026 – The European Union convenes an emergency meeting in Brussels, gathering ambassadors from all 27 member states to coordinate a response to the U.S. tariff threat [2].
Jan 18, 2026 – Thousands demonstrate in Nuuk and Copenhagen, carrying signs demanding respect for Greenlandic self‑determination and opposing any sale of the territory [2].
Jan 18, 2026 – NATO allies – France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom – dispatch small reconnaissance contingents to Greenland as part of the Danish‑led “Arctic Endurance” exercise, which they describe as “non‑threatening” and focused on regional security [2].
Jan 18, 2026 – The eight targeted countries issue a joint statement denouncing the tariff threat as “a threat to transatlantic relations” and urging dialogue over Greenland’s status [4].
Jan 18, 2026 – EU Council President Antonio Costa announces that EU leaders will meet later in the week to formulate a unified response, warning that the tariffs would “undermine the EU‑U.S. trade framework” [6].
Jan 18, 2026 – Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni labels the tariff plan “a mistake,” emphasizing that European troop deployments to Greenland are aimed at broader Arctic security, not at the United States [6].
Jan 19, 2026 – EU envoys reiterate that the tariffs would “undermine the EU‑U.S. trade agreement” and confirm the upcoming summit to coordinate a collective defense against U.S. coercion [3].
Jan 19, 2026 – Trump posts on Truth Social that NATO has warned Denmark for two decades about a Russian threat to Greenland, adding a public dimension to the dispute by linking NATO warnings to his demand for policy change [3].
Jan 19, 2026 – Legal analysts highlight uncertainty over how the White House could legally impose tariffs on EU members and whether such actions would survive a Supreme Court challenge [3].
Jan 20, 2026 – Europe hardens its stance: Germany’s finance minister declares, “We will not be blackmailed into concessions,” rejecting U.S. pressure over the tariff threat [1].
Jan 20, 2026 – EU diplomats warn they could retaliate with up to €93 billion in tariffs on U.S. goods or restrict American banks and high‑tech firms from the single market if the Greenland plan proceeds [1].
Jan 20, 2026 – The EU and the United Kingdom stress the need for continued engagement with Washington while signaling resolve; the UK prime minister asserts, “It is in Britain’s national interest to maintain cooperation with the United States on defence, security and intelligence” [1].