Trump’s Greenland Bid Triggers NATO Rift, Russia Weighs Board of Peace Participation
Updated (3 articles)
Tariff Threat Raises Stakes in Arctic Dispute President Trump announced a 10 % levy on any NATO ally that opposes U.S. claims to Greenland, with the tariff slated for February 2026. The move is described as unprecedented economic coercion aimed at forcing Denmark and its partners to acquiesce [3]. Analysts warn the policy could destabilize long‑standing transatlantic trade ties and test the alliance’s internal discipline [3].
NATO Unity Tested by Unilateral American Action Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov warned that the Greenland episode could spark a deep crisis within NATO, even suggesting the possibility of intra‑alliance conflict [1]. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas posted that China and Russia are likely celebrating the strain on the alliance, underscoring Western fears of a split [2]. CNN notes the Kremlin has long used disinformation to erode U.S.–Europe cohesion, viewing the dispute as a flashpoint for broader Russian strategy in the Arctic [2].
Russia Denies Direct Threat While Monitoring Developments Lavrov emphasized that neither Moscow nor Beijing intend to threaten Greenland, stating they are merely observing the situation [1]. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov labeled Trump’s actions as operating outside international law, reflecting a calibrated Russian response to U.S. unilateralism [2]. Both ministries stress that Russia’s primary concern is the potential reshaping of the rules‑based order, not immediate territorial aggression [1][2].
Board of Peace Invitation Opens New Diplomatic Channel Lavrov offered cautious approval of Trump’s “Board of Peace,” noting its origins in Gaza but suggesting it could assume a broader global mandate [1]. The Kremlin confirmed it is studying the invitation and awaiting further details from Washington, hinting at a possible platform for U.S.–Russia cooperation beyond existing institutions [1]. This development signals Moscow’s willingness to engage on multilateral initiatives if they align with its strategic interests [1].
European Leaders React to Economic Coercion Kaja Kallas warned on X that the tariff threat could push European allies toward closer ties with China and Russia, highlighting the geopolitical ripple effects [2]. The BBC contrasted the U.S. pressure with Canada’s 14 % trade rebound, illustrating divergent economic trajectories among NATO members [3]. Trump is scheduled to meet allied leaders at the World Economic Forum, where the tariff issue is expected to dominate discussions on transatlantic relations [3].
Sources (3 articles)
-
[1]
AP: Lavrov says NATO faces deep crisis over Greenland as Trump bids to take over: Lavrov frames Trump’s Greenland bid as a catalyst for a NATO crisis, denounces Denmark’s colonial claim, and notes Russia and China are not threatening Greenland while studying a Board of Peace invitation .
-
[2]
CNN: Trump's Greenland gambit tests US-Europe unity and NATO's future: Highlights Kremlin strategy to split the West, includes statements from Kaja Kallas, Peskov, Putin, and Russian media praising the move as a blow to NATO .
-
[3]
BBC: Trump Greenland threat described as unprecedented coercion against allies: Details the 10 % tariff threat, its unprecedented nature, potential destabilization of NATO, and mentions Canada’s trade rebound and the upcoming WEF meeting .
Timeline
Early Jan 2026 – Vladimir Putin delivers his first foreign‑policy address of the year, condemning unilateral “might‑makes‑right” actions and urging dialogue and compromise, framing Washington’s Greenland push as a breach of the rules‑based order [2].
Mid‑Jan 2026 – President Donald Trump announces a 10 % tariff on any allied nation that opposes a U.S. annexation of Greenland, with the levy set to take effect in February [1].
Mid‑Jan 2026 – Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney makes a high‑profile trip to China to promote a “new world order” and expand trade, noting that Canada’s total trade with the world has risen about 14 % [1].
Mid‑Jan 2026 – New details surface in the Minneapolis ICE shooting case, linking the domestic enforcement incident to the broader tensions surrounding U.S. policy on Greenland [1].
Jan 18, 2026 – Trump schedules a meeting with leaders of allied economies at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where the looming Greenland tariff threat dominates discussions on transatlantic relations and market stability [1].
Jan 20, 2026 – EU foreign‑policy chief Kaja Kallas posts on X that China and Russia are “having a field day” over Trump’s tariff threat, underscoring Western fears that the move could fracture NATO unity [2].
Jan 20, 2026 – Russian state media hail the Greenland move as a “catastrophic blow to NATO,” while Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declares the action “outside the norms of international law” as Moscow weighs its Arctic interests [2].
Jan 20, 2026 – Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warns that Trump’s Greenland bid sparks a deep NATO crisis, calls Denmark’s claim a colonial relic, offers cautious approval of Trump’s “Board of Peace,” and says the Kremlin is studying an invitation to join the board [3].
Feb 2026 (planned) – The 10 % tariffs on dissenting allies are scheduled to be imposed, a step that could test NATO cohesion, provoke economic retaliation, and reshape Western alliance dynamics [1].